Associate Professor Jamie Pittock of Australian National University ANU (see more here) will give a presentation on FRIDAY 13.11 at 11 am at Water Building’s meeting room 287 (Otakaari 1E, Espoo: building #34 in Aalto University’s Otaniemi Campus Map, for more detailed map on how to get there see here).
Jamie’s visit is linked to our Academy of Finland -funded NexusAsia project, and the topic of his presentation is “Modelling the hydropower-food nexus in large river basins: case Mekong”. Jamie’s research is part of a partnership with the Luic Hoffmann Institute and WWF.
Jamie is also prepared to talk about his other on-going research, including climate adaptation in the Murray Darling basin.
We expect the presentation and related discussion to last until around 12.30, after which we’ll head for lunch.
No official registration is needed, but please do drop me a line if you plan to come.
University Lecturer, Dr
Water & Development, Aalto University, Finland
+358 50 3824626
NEW ARTICLE IN PLOS ONE
In spite of the high importance of forests, global forest loss has remained alarmingly high during the last decades. Forest loss at a global scale has been unveiled with increasingly finer spatial resolution, but the forest extent and loss in protected areas (PAs) and in large intact forest landscapes (IFLs) have not so far been systematically assessed. Moreover, the impact of protection on preserving the IFLs is not well understood. In this study we conducted a consistent assessment of the global forest loss in PAs and IFLs over the period 2000-2012. We used recently published global remote sensing based spatial forest cover change data, being a uniform and consistent dataset over space and time, together with global datasets on PAs’ and IFLs’ locations. Our analyses revealed that on a global scale 3% of the protected forest, 2.5% of the intact forest, and 1.5% of the protected intact forest were lost during the study period. These forest loss rates are relatively high compared to global total forest loss of 5% for the same time period. The variation in forest losses and in protection effect was large among geographical regions and countries. In some regions the loss in protected forests exceeded 5% (e.g. in Australia and Oceania, and North America) and the relative forest loss was higher inside protected areas than outside those areas (e.g. in Mongolia and parts of Africa, Central Asia, and Europe). At the same time, protection was found to prevent forest loss in several countries (e.g. in South America and Southeast Asia). Globally, high area-weighted forest loss rates of protected and intact forests were associated with high gross domestic product and in the case of protected forests also with high proportions of agricultural land. Our findings reinforce the need for improved understanding of the reasons for the high forest losses in PAs and IFLs and strategies to prevent further losses.
Figure. Global loss of forests (A) and loss of forest in protected areas (B) by country.
Figure. Deforestation in Cambodia.
Heino, M., Kummu, M., Makkonen, M., Mulligan, M., Verburg, H., Jalava, M., Räsänen, T.A., 2015. Forest Loss in Protected Areas and Intact Forest Landscapes: A Global Analysis. PLoS One 10(10) e0138918. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138918
ARTICLE AVAILABLE AT: PLOS ONE